[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The manpage disagrees with you: > > Do you jest? > > This manpages is wrong, or, to be more exact, is incomplete, > which is common flaw of them. > > get/set mean nothing but read-only/changing, i.e. > another important property missing in ioctl interface. setsockopt i.e. set socket options I think that Andrea's point is that SIOCPUSH don't set anything (i.e. don't change a state), but ask for an action to be done now. For this reason the name setsockopt is counter intuitive (apart from man page) and it seems to violate the principle of least surprise. I think this point of view is easily agreeable. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ALSA project is http://www.alsa-project.org sponsored by SuSE Linux http://www.suse.com It sounds good! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli