On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > not to make a big issue out of this, but when was the last time you > > > tried to grep this way: > > > > > > grep -E "audit_rate_limit=[0-9]+ audit_backlog" */*.c > > > > Not precisely that, but I've certainly had greps fail because people > > have split up strings to meet the stupid 80-character "limit". > > yes - but if you read my whole reply you'll see that i qualified it: > > >> That's pretty much the only grep pattern that would break. People > >> usually grep on the constant portion of the string, so breaking up a > >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> line along a variable boundary is perfectly okay.
Yes, you did. But you failed to provide any good reason for actually changing it, either. Leave it as it was. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
