Em Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:19:34PM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > On 2/3/2021 3:31 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_event_attr_fprintf.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_event_attr_fprintf.c > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void __p_sample_type(char *buf, size_t size, u64 > > > value) > > > bit_name(BRANCH_STACK), bit_name(REGS_USER), > > > bit_name(STACK_USER), > > > bit_name(IDENTIFIER), bit_name(REGS_INTR), > > > bit_name(DATA_SRC), > > > bit_name(WEIGHT), bit_name(PHYS_ADDR), bit_name(AUX), > > > - bit_name(CGROUP), bit_name(DATA_PAGE_SIZE), > > > + bit_name(CGROUP), bit_name(DATA_PAGE_SIZE), > > > bit_name(WEIGHT_STRUCT), > > I have CODE_PAGE_SIZE in my perf/core branch, was this somehow removed? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=c1de7f3d84ca324c7cda85c3ce27b11741af2124 > > > > I see, you did this patchkit on top of upstream, that has just > > DATA_PAGE_SIZE, while my perf/core branch has CODE_PAGE_SIZE. I'm > > adjusting it, please next time do tooling development on acme/perf/core. > > Sorry, I will rebase the patchset on acme/perf/core.
No need. Look at tmp.perf/core, please test it, its all already adjusted there. - Arnaldo
