On Tue 02-02-21 13:47:40, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The memcg hotunplug callback erroneously flushes counts on the local
> CPU, not the counts of the CPU going away; those counts will be lost.
> 
> Flush the CPU that is actually going away.
> 
> Also simplify the code a bit by using mod_memcg_state() and
> count_memcg_events() instead of open-coding the upward flush - this is
> comparable to how vmstat.c handles hotunplug flushing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>

Shakeel has already pointed out Fixes.

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ed5cc78a8dbf..8120d565dd79 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2411,45 +2411,52 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup 
> *root_memcg)
>  static int memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>       struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
> -     struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *mi;
> +     struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>  
>       stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
>       drain_stock(stock);
>  
>       for_each_mem_cgroup(memcg) {
> +             struct memcg_vmstats_percpu *statc;
>               int i;
>  
> +             statc = per_cpu_ptr(memcg->vmstats_percpu, cpu);
> +
>               for (i = 0; i < MEMCG_NR_STAT; i++) {
>                       int nid;
> -                     long x;
>  
> -                     x = this_cpu_xchg(memcg->vmstats_percpu->stat[i], 0);
> -                     if (x)
> -                             for (mi = memcg; mi; mi = parent_mem_cgroup(mi))
> -                                     atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmstats[i]);
> +                     if (statc->stat[i]) {
> +                             mod_memcg_state(memcg, i, statc->stat[i]);
> +                             statc->stat[i] = 0;
> +                     }
>  
>                       if (i >= NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS)
>                               continue;
>  
>                       for_each_node(nid) {
> +                             struct batched_lruvec_stat *lstatc;
>                               struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
> +                             long x;
>  
>                               pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
> -                             x = 
> this_cpu_xchg(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu->count[i], 0);
> -                             if (x)
> +                             lstatc = per_cpu_ptr(pn->lruvec_stat_cpu, cpu);
> +
> +                             x = lstatc->count[i];
> +                             lstatc->count[i] = 0;
> +
> +                             if (x) {
>                                       do {
>                                               atomic_long_add(x, 
> &pn->lruvec_stat[i]);
>                                       } while ((pn = parent_nodeinfo(pn, 
> nid)));
> +                             }
>                       }
>               }
>  
>               for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS; i++) {
> -                     long x;
> -
> -                     x = this_cpu_xchg(memcg->vmstats_percpu->events[i], 0);
> -                     if (x)
> -                             for (mi = memcg; mi; mi = parent_mem_cgroup(mi))
> -                                     atomic_long_add(x, &memcg->vmevents[i]);
> +                     if (statc->events[i]) {
> +                             count_memcg_events(memcg, i, statc->events[i]);
> +                             statc->events[i] = 0;
> +                     }
>               }
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to