On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 13:45 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:07 AM Yunfeng Ye <yeyunf...@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> > It's not a good way to access phys_proc_id and cpu_die_id directly.
> > So using topology_physical_package_id(cpu) and topology_die_id(cpu)
> > instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunf...@huawei.com>
>
> Srinivas, Rui, any concerns?
Looks good.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> > ---
> > drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> > b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> > index c9e57237d778..5f3d39b8212a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
> > @@ -1309,7 +1309,6 @@ struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int
> > cpu, struct rapl_if_priv *priv)
> > {
> > int id = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> > struct rapl_package *rp;
> > - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (!rapl_defaults)
> > @@ -1326,10 +1325,11 @@ struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int
> > cpu, struct rapl_if_priv *priv)
> >
> > if (topology_max_die_per_package() > 1)
> > snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH,
> > - "package-%d-die-%d", c->phys_proc_id, c-
> > >cpu_die_id);
> > + "package-%d-die-%d",
> > + topology_physical_package_id(cpu),
> > topology_die_id(cpu));
> > else
> > snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH,
> > "package-%d",
> > - c->phys_proc_id);
> > + topology_physical_package_id(cpu));
> >
> > /* check if the package contains valid domains */
> > if (rapl_detect_domains(rp, cpu) || rapl_defaults-
> > >check_unit(rp, cpu)) {
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
