Hello! On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 4:20 PM Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 6, 2021, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> From: Menglong Dong <[email protected]> >> >> The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it >> with BIT_MASK to make it clear to understand. > > > It makes it more confusing if you understand the difference between > BIT_MASK() and BIT(). I think you have to use the latter. And note () when > referring to the function or macro. >
I replaced BIT_MASK() with BIT() in the patch of v2, and it looks much more tidy. I can't figure out the difference between BIT() and BIT_MASK(), seems the latter one more safe... isn't it? Thanks:) Menglong Dong
