On 08/02/21, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:41 AM Jens Wiklander > <jens.wiklan...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > > > > > Storing a bogus i2c_client structure on the stack adds overhead and > > > causes a compile-time warning: > > > > > > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c:493:6: error: stack frame size of 1056 bytes in > > > function 'optee_handle_rpc' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] > > > void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param > > > *param, > > > > > > Change the implementation of handle_rpc_func_cmd_i2c_transfer() to > > > open-code the i2c_transfer() call, which makes it easier to read > > > and avoids the warning. > > > > > > Fixes: c05210ab9757 ("drivers: optee: allow op-tee to access devices on > > > the i2c bus") > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > > --- > > > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > Looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklan...@linaro.org> > > Would you mind testing this?
sure, doing it this morning. btw what Arnd has done - removing the unnecessary level of indirection - was pretty much my initial though but I thought it was easier to read the way I wrote it (I guess I was wrong and I obviously missed the stack size increase) but yes, will test > > Thanks, > Jens