From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

commit e4747cb3ec3c232d65c84cbe77633abd5871fda3 upstream.

If we enable_breadcrumbs for a request while that request is being
removed from HW; we may see that the request is active as we take the
ce->signal_lock and proceed to attach the request to ce->signals.
However, during unsubmission after marking the request as inactive, we
see that the request has not yet been added to ce->signals and so skip
the removal. Pull the check during cancel_breadcrumbs under the same
spinlock as enabling so that we the two tests are consistent in
enable/cancel.

Otherwise, we may insert a request onto ce->signals that we expect should
not be there:

  intel_context_remove_breadcrumbs:488 
GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_request_is_complete(rq))

While updating, we can note that we are always called with
irqs-disabled, due to the engine->active.lock being held at the single
caller, and so remove the irqsave/restore making it symmetric to
enable_breadcrumbs.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2931
Fixes: c18636f76344 ("drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding 
i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.sh...@intel.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Link: 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119162057.31097-1-ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit e7004ea4f5f528f5a5018f0b70cab36d25315498)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -451,10 +451,12 @@ void i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(stru
        struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
        bool release;
 
-       if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags))
+       spin_lock(&ce->signal_lock);
+       if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags)) {
+               spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
                return;
+       }
 
-       spin_lock(&ce->signal_lock);
        list_del_rcu(&rq->signal_link);
        release = remove_signaling_context(rq->engine->breadcrumbs, ce);
        spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);


Reply via email to