Mike Rapoport <r...@kernel.org> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:09:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:37:14 -0300 Thiago Jung Bauermann >> <bauer...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> > Mike Rapoport <r...@kernel.org> writes: >> > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com> >> > > >> > > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com> >> > >> > I've seen a couple of spurious triggers of the WARN_ONCE() removed by this >> > patch. This happens on some ppc64le bare metal (powernv) server machines >> > with >> > CONFIG_SWIOTLB=y and crashkernel=4G, as described in a candidate patch I >> > posted >> > to solve this issue in a different way: >> > >> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20201218062103.76102-1-bauer...@linux.ibm.com/ >> > >> > Since this patch solves that problem, is it possible to include it in the >> > next >> > feasible v5.11-rcX, with the following tag? >> >> We could do this, if we're confident that this patch doesn't depend on >> [1/2] "mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up"? I think it is... > > A think it does not depend on cma bottom-up allocation, it's rather the other > way around: without this CMA bottom-up allocation could fail with KASLR > enabled. I noticed that this patch is now upstream as: 2dcb39645441 memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with kernel_end > Still, this patch may need updates to the way x86 does early reservations: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210115083255.12744-1-r...@kernel.org ... but the patches from this link still aren't. Isn't this a potential problem for x86? The patch series on the link above is now superseded by v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210128105711.10428-1-r...@kernel.org/ -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center