On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:54:24PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:31:24PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > Not everything in drivers/ is suitable for every ARM configuration. It > > was felt at the time better for ARM to remain separate because people > > didn't want to pollute drivers/Kconfig with the ARM specific conditionals. > > > Today we would have used HAVE_ for the problematic parts and thus > it would have been easy to not select what ARM does not support. > But unfortunately thats not how it got designed. > > > It would be nice to revist one day to see how much is actually needed > to cleanly supprt ARM in drivers/Kconfig.
You could diff the two Kconfig files - I try to keep them so they list the same Kconfigs in the same order to keep the diff size down. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
