From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

There is no reason to have this as a seperate function for a single caller.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
---
V2: Adopt to the new header file.
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h     |    3 +--
 arch/x86/include/asm/softirq_stack.h |   11 +++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c             |    5 -----
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
  * interrupts are pending to be processed. The interrupt stack cannot be in
  * use here.
  */
-#define run_softirq_on_irqstack()                                      \
+#define do_softirq_own_stack()                                         \
 {                                                                      \
        __this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, true);                    \
        call_on_irqstack(__do_softirq, ASM_CALL_SOFTIRQ);               \
@@ -202,7 +202,6 @@
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
 /* System vector handlers always run on the stack they interrupted. */
 #define run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(func, regs)                                
\
 {                                                                      \
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/softirq_stack.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_X86_SOFTIRQ_STACK_H
+#define _ASM_X86_SOFTIRQ_STACK_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+# include <asm/irq_stack.h>
+#else
+# include <asm-generic/softirq_stack.h>
+#endif
+
+#endif
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -74,8 +74,3 @@ int irq_init_percpu_irqstack(unsigned in
                return 0;
        return map_irq_stack(cpu);
 }
-
-void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
-{
-       run_softirq_on_irqstack();
-}

Reply via email to