Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does a patch like this change the behaviour you see at all?
> + bd_inode->i_size = (loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9;
It does fix my scenario, with the trivial fix of adding bdev-> at the
beginning of that line, ie:
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 993f78c..a8ed344 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static int do_open(struct block_device *bdev, struct file
*file, int for_part)
}
if (bdev->bd_invalidated)
rescan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, bdev);
+ bdev->bd_inode->i_size = (loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9;
}
}
bdev->bd_openers++;
--
Peter Osterlund - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.telia.com/~u89404340
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
