On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 04:07 +0000, Song Liu wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2021, at 6:10 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 13:19 -0800, Song Liu wrote: > > > BPF programs explicitly initialise global variables to 0 to make sure > > > clang (v10 or older) do not put the variables in the common section. > > > > Acked-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> > > > > So the patch is OK now, but I have a question about the concept: > > > > Do you mean that these initialized to 0 global variables > > should go into bss or another section? > > We want these variables to go to bss.
OK, then the patch is fine. > > Perhaps it'd be useful to somehow mark variables into specific > > sections rather than bss when initialized to 0 and data when not > > initialized to 0. > > Currently, libbpf expects zero initialized global data in bss. This > convention works well so far. Is there any reason that we specify > section for global data? There's no need I know of. cheers, Joe
