On 20-01-21, 13:05, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 20 Jan 12:25 CST 2021, Taniya Das wrote: > > > The CPUFREQ-HW driver is intended to be used only for CPUFREQ HW designs > > where the firmware programs the look up tables. > > > > It's obvious that this is the intended target for the current version of > the driver, but what are your technical arguments for keeping it that > way? > > > Suggestion is to separate out the driver where the programming is managed by > > high level OS. > > > > Can you please elaborate on the benefits of this approach? > > PS. Please don't top-post on LKML.
Taniya, Can you please respond back to this ? We are waiting for merging this patchset.. Bjorn, can you or someone else please review this patch ? -- viresh
