On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 01:39:41 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> On 2021/02/11 1:18, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > The point of this exercise is to be able to debug the *same* kernel that > > someone is having issues with. And this is to facilitate that debugging. > > That's too difficult to use. If a problem is not reproducible, we will have > no choice but always specify "never hash pointers" command line option. If a > problem is reproducible, we can rebuild that kernel with "never hash pointers" > config option turned on. Now the question is, why do you need the unhashed pointer? Currently, the instruction pointer is what is fine right? You get the a function and its offset. If there's something that is needed, perhaps we should look at how to fix that, instead of just unhashing all pointers by default. -- Steve
