On 11/02/2021 15:16, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> This series adds a driver to provide platform profile support on 5th-
> and later generation Microsoft Surface devices with a Surface System
> Aggregator Module. On those devices, the platform profile can be used to
> influence cooling behavior and power consumption.
> 
> To achieve this, a new platform profile is introduced: the
> 'balanced-performance' profile.
> 
> In addition, a couple of fix-ups are performed:
> - Hide CONFIG_ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE and change drivers so that it is
>   selected instead of depended on.
> - Fix some references to documentation in a comment.
> 
> Note: This series (or more specifically "platform/surface: Add platform
> profile driver") depends on the "platform/surface: Add Surface
> Aggregator device registry" series.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Introduce new 'balanced-performance' platform profile and change
>    profile mapping in driver.
>  - Perform some fix-ups for the ACPI platform profile implementation:
>    - Fix some references to documentation in a comment.
>    - Hide CONFIG_ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
> 
> Maximilian Luz (4):
>   ACPI: platform: Hide ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE option
>   ACPI: platform: Fix file references in comment
>   ACPI: platform: Add balanced-performance platform profile
>   platform/surface: Add platform profile driver
> 
>  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile        |  18 +-
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   6 +
>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig                          |  16 +-
>  drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c               |   1 +
>  drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig              |  22 ++
>  drivers/platform/surface/Makefile             |   1 +
>  .../surface/surface_platform_profile.c        | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                  |   4 +-
>  include/linux/platform_profile.h              |   6 +-
>  9 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/surface/surface_platform_profile.c
> 
I looked through the patch series and it all looked good to me.
Glad the platform profile implementation is getting used in more places :)

Thanks
Mark

Reply via email to