Hi, Thanks for your review.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:07:21AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:06:53PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > Add dwmac-visconti to the stmmac driver in Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs. > > This patch contains only the basic function of the device. There is no > > clock control, PM, etc. yet. These will be added in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwama...@toshiba.co.jp> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig | 8 + > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile | 1 + > > .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-visconti.c | 285 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 294 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-visconti.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > index 53f14c5a9e02..55ba67a550b9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ config DWMAC_INTEL_PLAT > > This selects the Intel platform specific glue layer support for > > the stmmac device driver. This driver is used for the Intel Keem Bay > > SoC. > > + > > +config DWMAC_VISCONTI > > + bool "Toshiba Visconti DWMAC support" > > + def_bool y > Sorry, I sent the wrong patchset that didn't fix this point out. > I asked it before, but never received an answer. I have received your point out and have sent an email with the content to remove this line. But it may not have arrived yet... > Why did you use "def_bool y" and not "default y"? Isn't it supposed to be > "depends on STMMAC_ETH"? And probably it shouldn't be set as a default as "y". > The reason why "def_bool y" was set is that the wrong fix was left when debugging. Also, I don't think it is necessary to set "default y". This is also incorrect because it says "bool" Toshiba Visconti DWMAC support "". I change it to trustate in the new patch. And this driver is enabled when STMMAC_PLATFORM was Y. And STMMAC_PLATFORM depends on STMMAC_ETH. So I understand that STMMAC_ETH does not need to be dependents. Is this understanding wrong? > Thanks > Best regards, Nobuhiro
