On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:16:52PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:

> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct 
> cpumask *srcp)
>       return find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits);
>  }
>  
> -unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp);
> +unsigned int __pure cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp);
>  
>  /**
>   * cpumask_next_zero - get the next unset cpu in a cpumask

I've changed it to:

__pure unsigned int cpumask_next(...);

to be consistent with these:

> @@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const 
> struct cpumask *srcp)
>       return find_next_zero_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>  }
>  
> -int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *);
> -int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
> +__pure int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct 
> cpumask *);
> +__pure int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
>  unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node);
>  int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
>                              const struct cpumask *src2p);


Reply via email to