On 2/15/21 6:31 PM, viswa...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi John,

We could test this patch and it works fine. Regarding the usage of 
request->tag, We have some challenges there.
Pm80xx driver need tag for internal command as well. Tag is controller wide and 
we need to assign unique tag
for internal command as well. If we use request->tag, how can we get tag for 
internal commands ? If driver
allocate that, how can we make sure it will not conflict with the request->tag ?

I have posted a patchset for internal tags some time ago; at the time it was blocked by the missing shared tagset functionality. But seeing that we're having it now I guess I'll need to repost; that addresses precisely the issue you've described.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
h...@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

Reply via email to