On Saturday January 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Move the initialzation in __svc_create_thread that happens prior to
> thread creation to a new function. Export the function to allow
> services to have better control over the svc_rqst structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |    2 ++
>  net/sunrpc/svc.c           |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 8531a70..5f07300 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ struct svc_procedure {
>   */
>  struct svc_serv *  svc_create(struct svc_program *, unsigned int,
>                             void (*shutdown)(struct svc_serv*));
> +struct svc_rqst *svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv,
> +                                     struct svc_pool *pool);
>  int             svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn, struct svc_serv *);
>  void            svc_exit_thread(struct svc_rqst *);
>  struct svc_serv *  svc_create_pooled(struct svc_program *, unsigned int,
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> index fca17d0..b29ed43 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> @@ -538,23 +538,14 @@ svc_release_buffer(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>                       put_page(rqstp->rq_pages[i]);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Create a thread in the given pool.  Caller must hold BKL.
> - * On a NUMA or SMP machine, with a multi-pool serv, the thread
> - * will be restricted to run on the cpus belonging to the pool.
> - */
> -static int
> -__svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn func, struct svc_serv *serv,
> -                 struct svc_pool *pool)
> +struct svc_rqst *
> +svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool)
>  {
>       struct svc_rqst *rqstp;
> -     int             error = -ENOMEM;
> -     int             have_oldmask = 0;
> -     cpumask_t       oldmask;
>  
>       rqstp = kzalloc(sizeof(*rqstp), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!rqstp)
> -             goto out;
> +             goto out_enomem;
>  
>       init_waitqueue_head(&rqstp->rq_wait);
>  
> @@ -570,6 +561,34 @@ __svc_create_thread(svc_thread_fn func, struct svc_serv 
> *serv,
>       spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
>       rqstp->rq_server = serv;
>       rqstp->rq_pool = pool;
> +     return rqstp;
> +
> +out_thread:
> +     svc_exit_thread(rqstp);

I realise that the bug existed before your change, but calling
svc_exit_thread at this point is not good.
The 'goto out_thread' is *before* "pool->sp_nrthreads++", but
svc_exit_thread does "pool->sp_nrthreads--;".  Not good.

As you are playing is this code, do you feel like fixing that error
path??


Otherwise, patch looks good.
Acked-By: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to