On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:10:35AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 17/02/2021 09:36, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:28:09AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > >> > >> Le 17/02/2021 à 09:08, Greg KH a écrit : > >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:02:48AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > >>>> The IMX8MQ got two VPUs but until now only G1 has been enabled. > >>>> This series aim to add the second VPU (aka G2) and provide basic > >>>> HEVC decoding support. > >>> Why are you adding this directly to drivers/staging/media/ and not > >>> drivers/media/? Why can't this just go to the main location and not > >>> live in staging? > >> > >> G2/HEVC is added inside the already exiting Hantro driver, it is "just" > >> an other codec from Hantro driver point of view. > >> In addition of that v4l2-hevc uAPI is still unstable. > >> One goal of this series is to have one more consumer of this v4l2-hevc > >> uAPI so maybe we can claim it to be stable enough to move away from staging > >> and then do the same for Hantro driver. That would be a great achievement ! > > > > I know I do not like seeing new additions/features/whatever being added > > to staging drivers as that encourages people to do new stuff on them > > without doing the real work needed to get them out of staging. > > In order to support a specific codec (MPEG-2, H.264, HEVC, VP8, etc.) for > stateless codec hardware like the hantro, V4L2 controls need to be defined. > The contents of these controls is derived directly from the underlying codec > standards, but it is quite difficult to get this right with the first attempt, > since these standards are very complex. > > So we went for the strategy of keeping these drivers in staging to make it > easy to work on, while keeping the APIs for each codec private (i.e., they are > not exposed in include/uapi/linux). > > Once we have sufficient confidence in the API for a specific codec we move > it to uapi and thus fix the API. We also renumber the control IDs at that > time to avoid any confusion between the staging version and the final version. > > We did that for H.264 and I hope we can soon do the same for MPEG-2 and VP8. > > HEVC is definitely not ready for that yet. > > The key phrase is 'sufficient confidence': one requirement is that it is > supported > by at least two drivers to be reasonably certain the API doesn't contain any > HW > specific stuff, and it passes test suites and review by codec experts. > > All this is actively being worked on, so this is very much alive, but it is > complex and time consuming. > > > So what is preventing the existing driver from getting out of staging > > now? > > Once MPEG-2 and VP8 are finalized it is probably time to move these drivers > out of staging, while still keeping the HEVC API part private. > > > > > And how are you all creating new userspace apis for staging drivers to > > the v4l layer? What happens when you export something new and then > > userspace starts to rely on it and then you change it? > > Nothing is exported. So if userspace want to use it they have to manually > copy headers from include/media to their application. > > > > > Anyway, the media staging drivers are on their own, I don't touch them, > > it just feels odd to me... > > It's an unusual situation. But putting the drivers in staging and keeping > the codec API headers private turns out to be the most effective way to > develop this.
Ah, ok, thanks for the explaination, makes sense. good luck! greg k-h
