On 19-02-21, 16:20, Yue Hu wrote: > However, we will skip the update if need_freq_update is not set.
Not really, we will update freq periodically nevertheless, around every 10ms or something.. > And do the update if need_freq_update is set. Yeah, that breaks the periodic cycle to attend to some urgent request. > Note that there are unnecessary fast switch check and spin lock/unlock > operations in freq skip path. Maybe, I am not sure. We are all up for optimizations if there are any. > If we consider unnecessary behaviors above, then we should return right > away rather than continue to execute following code. As I said earlier, we may end up updating the frequency even if need_freq_update is unset. -- viresh
