Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Ingo, >> >> I think local_irq_enable() is missing in default_idle() on x86_64. >> It's for recent x86 tree. >> >> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: enable irq in default_idle >> >> local_irq_enable() is missing after sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(). > > thanks Hiroshi, applied. > > The effects of this bug should be increased latencies on 64-bit. Did you > notice these latencies, or did you find the bug in some other way (code > review)?
I found this when I was comparing 32-bit and 64-bit source code for x86 unification. Thanks, Hiroshi Shimamoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
