Sorry,it was my fault, I will resubmit.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 9:54 AM David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/19/21 9:32 PM, Yejune Deng wrote:
> > static const struct neigh_ops arp_direct_ops = {
> > .family = AF_INET,
> > .output = neigh_direct_output,
> > @@ -277,15 +269,10 @@ static int arp_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
> > memcpy(neigh->ha, dev->broadcast, dev->addr_len);
> > }
> >
> > - if (dev->header_ops->cache)
> > - neigh->ops = &arp_hh_ops;
> > - else
> > - neigh->ops = &arp_generic_ops;
>
> How did you test this?
>
> you took out the neigh->ops assignment, so all of the neigh->ops in
> net/core/neighbour.c are going to cause a NULL dereference.
>
>
> > -
> > - if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
> > - neigh->output = neigh->ops->connected_output;
> > + if (!dev->header_ops->cache && (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID))
> > + neigh->output = arp_generic_ops.connected_output;
> > else
> > - neigh->output = neigh->ops->output;
> > + neigh->output = arp_generic_ops.output;
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
