> @@ -2656,7 +2656,12 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host
> *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>
> lrbp->req_abort_skip = false;
>
> - ufshpb_prep(hba, lrbp);
> + err = ufshpb_prep(hba, lrbp);
> + if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> + lrbp->cmd = NULL;
> + ufshcd_release(hba);
> + goto out;
> + }
Did I miss-read it, or are you bailing out of wb failed e.g. because no tag is
available?
Why not continue with read10?
> + if (blk_insert_cloned_request(q, req) != BLK_STS_OK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
Why did you choose to use blk_insert_cloned_request and not e.g. the more
common blk_execute_rq_nowait?
> + hpb->stats.pre_req_cnt++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> - ufshpb_set_hpb_read_to_upiu(hpb, lrbp, lpn, ppn, transfer_len);
> + if (ufshpb_is_required_wb(hpb, transfer_len)) {
> + err = ufshpb_issue_pre_req(hpb, cmd, &read_id);
> + if (err) {
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> + timeout = cmd->jiffies_at_alloc + msecs_to_jiffies(
> + hpb->params.requeue_timeout_ms);
> + if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> + return -EAGAIN;
Why requeue_timeout_ms needs to be a configurable parameter?
Why rq->timeout is not enough?
Thanks,
Avri
