There is a need to know when a remote processor has been attached
to rather than booted by the remoteproc core.  In order to avoid
manipulating two variables, i.e rproc::autonomous and
rproc::state, get rid of the former and simply use the newly
introduced RPROC_ATTACHED state.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 20 +-------------------
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c |  5 +----
 include/linux/remoteproc.h            |  2 --
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 7b66e1e96e4a..8c7e9f1d50d7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
                goto stop_rproc;
        }
 
-       rproc->state = RPROC_RUNNING;
+       rproc->state = RPROC_ATTACHED;
 
        dev_info(dev, "remote processor %s is now attached\n", rproc->name);
 
@@ -1659,14 +1659,6 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
 
        rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
 
-       /*
-        * The remote processor has been stopped and is now offline, which means
-        * that the next time it is brought back online the remoteproc core will
-        * be responsible to load its firmware.  As such it is no longer
-        * autonomous.
-        */
-       rproc->autonomous = false;
-
        dev_info(dev, "stopped remote processor %s\n", rproc->name);
 
        return 0;
@@ -2077,16 +2069,6 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
        if (ret < 0)
                return ret;
 
-       /*
-        * Remind ourselves the remote processor has been attached to rather
-        * than booted by the remoteproc core.  This is important because the
-        * RPROC_DETACHED state will be lost as soon as the remote processor
-        * has been attached to.  Used in firmware_show() and reset in
-        * rproc_stop().
-        */
-       if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
-               rproc->autonomous = true;
-
        /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
        if (rproc->auto_boot) {
                ret = rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
index 4b4aab0d4c4b..f9694def9b54 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
@@ -138,11 +138,8 @@ static ssize_t firmware_show(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr,
         * If the remote processor has been started by an external
         * entity we have no idea of what image it is running.  As such
         * simply display a generic string rather then rproc->firmware.
-        *
-        * Here we rely on the autonomous flag because a remote processor
-        * may have been attached to and currently in a running state.
         */
-       if (rproc->autonomous)
+       if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
                firmware = "unknown";
 
        return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", firmware);
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index b0a57ff73849..6b0a0ed30a03 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
  * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
  * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
- * @autonomous: true if an external entity has booted the remote processor
  * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
@@ -549,7 +548,6 @@ struct rproc {
        size_t table_sz;
        bool has_iommu;
        bool auto_boot;
-       bool autonomous;
        struct list_head dump_segments;
        int nb_vdev;
        u8 elf_class;
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to