On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:19:30 MST, Matthew Wilcox said: > So you're saying that you can't find reliable ways to reproduce problems > on demand? Those are some of the lower quality bug reports, so I don't > think we're losing much by having you not report them.
And in the next e-mail in my lkml folder we see: On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:21:45 EST, Parag Warudkar said: > BTW, I have so far tested 2.6.24-rc4/5/6/7 and 2.6.23.12 - all of > which have this problem. > > Yesterday I went back to using 2.6.22.15 and after a day's uptime it > has not reproduced with the same config. > > Time for git-bisect I suppose? (the only problem is that this takes > anywhere between 20 minutes to 8 hrs to confirm reliably.) Are you saying that we're not losing much if Parag says "screw it" and doesn't report the problem?
pgpcIDYr8VWbg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
