On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:38:20PM +0530, Maheep Kumar Kathuria wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue in thresh_exec_hook()
>
> Signed-off-by: Maheep Kumar Kathuria <m...@maheepk.net>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> index 309516e6a968..38abeff7af69 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
> @@ -212,9 +212,8 @@ static inline void thresh_exec_hook(struct
> __btrfs_workqueue *wq)
> out:
> spin_unlock(&wq->thres_lock);
>
> - if (need_change) {
> + if (need_change)
> workqueue_set_max_active(wq->normal_wq, wq->current_active);
> - }
This is really a trivial change, have you checked if there are more?
Fixing them in a larger batch would be better than one by one.
