On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:56:41PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> In preparation for next patch, move the dma mapping into its own
> function, as this will make it easier to follow the changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  net/core/page_pool.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index ad8b0707af04..50d52aa6fbeb 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,31 @@ static void page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(struct 
> page_pool *pool,
>                                        pool->p.dma_dir);
>  }
>  
> +static struct page * page_pool_dma_map(struct page_pool *pool,
> +                                    struct page *page)
> +{

Why return a struct page* ?
boolean maybe?

> +     dma_addr_t dma;
> +
> +     /* Setup DMA mapping: use 'struct page' area for storing DMA-addr
> +      * since dma_addr_t can be either 32 or 64 bits and does not always fit
> +      * into page private data (i.e 32bit cpu with 64bit DMA caps)
> +      * This mapping is kept for lifetime of page, until leaving pool.
> +      */
> +     dma = dma_map_page_attrs(pool->p.dev, page, 0,
> +                              (PAGE_SIZE << pool->p.order),
> +                              pool->p.dma_dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> +     if (dma_mapping_error(pool->p.dev, dma)) {
> +             put_page(page);

This is a bit confusing when reading it. 
The name of the function should try to map the page and report a yes/no,
instead of trying to call put_page as well.
Can't we explicitly ask the user to call put_page() if the mapping failed?

A clear example is on patch 2/3, when on the first read I was convinced there
was a memory leak.

> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +     page->dma_addr = dma;
> +
> +     if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV)
> +             page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, pool->p.max_len);
> +
> +     return page;
> +}
> +
>  /* slow path */
>  noinline
>  static struct page *__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(struct page_pool *pool,
> @@ -187,7 +212,6 @@ static struct page *__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(struct 
> page_pool *pool,
>  {
>       struct page *page;
>       gfp_t gfp = _gfp;
> -     dma_addr_t dma;
>  
>       /* We could always set __GFP_COMP, and avoid this branch, as
>        * prep_new_page() can handle order-0 with __GFP_COMP.
> @@ -211,27 +235,12 @@ static struct page *__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(struct 
> page_pool *pool,
>       if (!page)
>               return NULL;
>  
> -     if (!(pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP))
> -             goto skip_dma_map;
> -
> -     /* Setup DMA mapping: use 'struct page' area for storing DMA-addr
> -      * since dma_addr_t can be either 32 or 64 bits and does not always fit
> -      * into page private data (i.e 32bit cpu with 64bit DMA caps)
> -      * This mapping is kept for lifetime of page, until leaving pool.
> -      */
> -     dma = dma_map_page_attrs(pool->p.dev, page, 0,
> -                              (PAGE_SIZE << pool->p.order),
> -                              pool->p.dma_dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> -     if (dma_mapping_error(pool->p.dev, dma)) {
> -             put_page(page);
> -             return NULL;
> +     if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP) {
> +             page = page_pool_dma_map(pool, page);
> +             if (!page)
> +                     return NULL;
>       }
> -     page->dma_addr = dma;
> -
> -     if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV)
> -             page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page, pool->p.max_len);
>  
> -skip_dma_map:
>       /* Track how many pages are held 'in-flight' */
>       pool->pages_state_hold_cnt++;
>  
> 
> 

Thanks!
/Ilias

Reply via email to