On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 07:16:44PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:33:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:06:23PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> > > Hi Chris, Arnaldo, Jiri,
> > > 
> > > We observe the parsing error for "software/xxx/" on some platforms.
> > > 
> > > For example,
> > > 
> > > # perf stat -e software/r1a/ -a -- sleep 1
> > > event syntax error: 'software/r1a/'
> > >                      \___ parser error
> > > Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
> > > 
> > >  Usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>]
> > > 
> > >     -e, --event <event>   event selector. use 'perf list' to list 
> > > available events
> > > 
> > > And perf test is failed too.
> > > 
> > > # perf test 6 -vv
> > > ...
> > > running test 4 'software/r1a/'failed to parse event 'software/r1a/', err 
> > > 1, str 'parser error'
> > > event syntax error: 'software/r1a/'
> > >                      \___ parser error
> > > 
> > > running test 4 'software/r0x1a/'failed to parse event 'software/r0x1a/', 
> > > err 1, str 'parser error'
> > > event syntax error: 'software/r0x1a/'
> > >                      \___ parser error
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > The issue should be the conflict between event 
> > > "i915/software-gt-awake-time/" and pmu "software".
> > > 
> > > # perf list | grep i915/software
> > >   i915/software-gt-awake-time/                       [Kernel PMU event]
> > > 
> > > Perf supports the event format as "prefix-xxx-suffix", so the "software"
> > > string in "software-gt-awake-time" is added to perf_pmu_events_list as
> > > PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL_PREFIX. When parsing the string such as "software/xxx/",
> > > it’s parsed as PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL_PREFIX for "software", then it would error
> > > out in next processing.
> > > 
> > > So the easy way is to rename "software-gt-awake-time" to "gt-awake-time",
> > > right? Otherwise we have to hardcode something in perf tool.
> > > 
> > > What do you think of this issue and the solution?
> > > 
> > > BTW, as the robot reported, it's related to the commit 8c3b1ba0e7ea
> > > ("drm/i915/gt: Track the overall awake/busy time").
> > 
> > yes, I think you're right.. I'll try to reproduce and check on this
> > 
> > I'm still not clear why is that parsing fail if those 2 events are
> > distinguished by - and / ... but yep, we are asking for trouble in
> > here ;-)
> > 
> > I think we could either prioritaze one or add extra check when we
> > add prefix-xxx-suffix events and do not add ones that have conflict..
> > that seems like best solution to me now
> 
> would patch below work for you?
> 
> jirka

and now with more fixes after I ran tests ;-)

we should perhaps add also same check for non '-' aliases, I'll check

jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 42c84adeb2fb..0b5d355ad4f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -2028,10 +2028,9 @@ static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void)
                perf_pmu_events_list_num = -1;
                return;
        }
-       perf_pmu_events_list = malloc(sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol) * 
len);
+       perf_pmu_events_list = zalloc(sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol) * 
len);
        if (!perf_pmu_events_list)
                return;
-       perf_pmu_events_list_num = len;
 
        len = 0;
        pmu = NULL;
@@ -2041,8 +2040,16 @@ static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void)
                        char *tmp = strchr(alias->name, '-');
 
                        if (tmp != NULL) {
-                               SET_SYMBOL(strndup(alias->name, tmp - 
alias->name),
-                                               PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL_PREFIX);
+                               char *prefix = strndup(alias->name, tmp - 
alias->name);
+
+                               if (perf_pmu__find(prefix)) {
+                                       pr_debug2("perf_pmu__parse_init: 
skipping conflicting alias '%s'\n",
+                                                 alias->name);
+                                       free(prefix);
+                                       continue;
+                               }
+
+                               SET_SYMBOL(prefix, PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL_PREFIX);
                                p++;
                                SET_SYMBOL(strdup(++tmp), 
PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL_SUFFIX);
                                len += 2;
@@ -2052,6 +2059,12 @@ static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void)
                        }
                }
        }
+
+       /* unlikely, but still.. */
+       if (!len)
+               goto err;
+       perf_pmu_events_list_num = len;
+
        qsort(perf_pmu_events_list, len,
                sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol), comp_pmu);
 

Reply via email to