The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning.
That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or none should be used in a driver. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c index 00bbd218f1e8..d35ff3f16a5b 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver i2c_hid_acpi_driver = { .name = "i2c_hid_acpi", .pm = &i2c_hid_core_pm, .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS, - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_hid_acpi_match), + .acpi_match_table = i2c_hid_acpi_match, }, .probe = i2c_hid_acpi_probe, -- 2.30.0