From: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>

In theory these are orthogonal, but in practice all NUMA systems are
SMP.  NUMA && !SMP doesn't build, everyone else is coupling them, and I
don't really see any value in supporting that configuration.

Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform")
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
---
This is on fixes.
---
 arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index a998babc1237..85d626b8ce5e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice
 # Common NUMA Features
 config NUMA
        bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
+       depends on SMP
        select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
        select OF_NUMA
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
-- 
2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog

Reply via email to