On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 15:10, Chanwoo Choi <chan...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
> > dev_err_probe(). Less code and the error value gets printed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > index 027769e39f9b..35b3542f1f7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > @@ -324,22 +324,14 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > mutex_init(&data->lock);
> >
> > data->vdd_center = devm_regulator_get(dev, "center");
> > - if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center)) {
> > - if (PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > -
> > - dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center);
> > - }
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center),
> > + "Cannot get the regulator
> > \"center\"\n");
> >
> > data->dmc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "dmc_clk");
> > - if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk)) {
> > - if (PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > -
> > - dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk);
> > - }
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk),
> > + "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
> >
> > data->edev = devfreq_event_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(data->edev))
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> Applied it. Thanks.
Hi Chanwoo,
Do you know what happened with this patch? You replied that it is
applied but I cannot find it in the Linus' or next trees.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
