On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:04:42 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..495575a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> > +/*
> > + * IOMMU helper functions for the free area management
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > +
> > +static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
> > + unsigned long size,
> > + unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned int nr,
> > + unsigned long align_mask)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long index, end, i;
> > +again:
> > + index = find_next_zero_bit(map, size, start);
> > +
> > + /* Align allocation */
> > + index = (index + align_mask) & ~align_mask;
> > +
> > + end = index + nr;
> > + if (end >= size)
> > + return -1;
>
> This '>=' looks doubtful to me, e.g.:
> map points to 0s only, size = 64, nr = 64,
> we get: index = 0; end = 64;
> and: return -1 ?!
You are right. I did it only because I didn't want to change the
original code (iommu_range_alloc in arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c). I
thought that there might be a mysterious reason for it so I let it
alone since it's tiny loss.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
