From: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>

[ Upstream commit 17d8beda277a36203585943e70c7909b60775fd5 ]

Commit 15d83c4d7cef ("bpf: Allow loading of a bpf_iter program")
cached btf_id in struct bpf_iter_target_info so later on
if it can be checked cheaply compared to checking registered names.

syzbot found a bug that uninitialized value may occur to
bpf_iter_target_info->btf_id. This is because we allocated
bpf_iter_target_info structure with kmalloc and never initialized
field btf_id afterwards. This uninitialized btf_id is typically
compared to a u32 bpf program func proto btf_id, and the chance
of being equal is extremely slim.

This patch fixed the issue by using kzalloc which will also
prevent future likely instances due to adding new fields.

Fixes: 15d83c4d7cef ("bpf: Allow loading of a bpf_iter program")
Reported-by: syzbot+580f4f2a272e452d5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212005926.2875002-1-...@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 5454161407f1f..a0d9eade9c804 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int bpf_iter_reg_target(const struct bpf_iter_reg *reg_info)
 {
        struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo;
 
-       tinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*tinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
+       tinfo = kzalloc(sizeof(*tinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!tinfo)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to