On 3/3/21 8:05 AM, dillon.min...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: dillon min <dillon.min...@gmail.com>
> 
> For some case, kernel not boot by u-boot(single thread),
> but by rtos , as most rtos use pendsv to do context switch.


Hmm, does it mean that it starts kernel from process context?

I'd assume that it is not only kernel who expects MSP. So, what
if RTOS you mentioned want to boot other RTOS (even itself)? What
if you have no access to the source code for those RTOS(es) to
patch MSP/PSP switch?

I'd very much prefer to keep stack switching logic outside kernel,
say, in some shim which RTOS/bootloader can maintain.

Cheers
Vladimir

> 
> So, we need add an lr check after svc call, to find out should
> use psp or msp. else register restore after svc call might be
> corrupted.
> 
> Fixes: b70cd406d7fe ("ARM: 8671/1: V7M: Preserve registers across switch from 
> Thread to Handler mode")
> Signed-off-by: dillon min <dillon.min...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/proc-v7m.S | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7m.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7m.S
> index 84459c1d31b8..c93d2757312d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7m.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7m.S
> @@ -137,7 +137,10 @@ __v7m_setup_cont:
>  1:   cpsid   i
>       /* Calculate exc_ret */
>       orr     r10, lr, #EXC_RET_THREADMODE_PROCESSSTACK
> -     ldmia   sp, {r0-r3, r12}
> +     tst     lr, #EXC_RET_STACK_MASK
> +     mrsne   r4, psp
> +     moveq   r4, sp
> +     ldmia   r4!, {r0-r3, r12}
>       str     r5, [r12, #11 * 4]      @ restore the original SVC vector entry
>       mov     lr, r6                  @ restore LR
>  
> 

Reply via email to