On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:39:56PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> For simplification 991e7673859e ("mm: memcontrol: account kernel stack
> per node") has changed the per zone vmalloc backed stack pages
> accounting to per node. By doing that we have lost a certain precision
> because those pages might live in different NUMA nodes. In the end
> NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB exported to the userspace might be over estimated on
> some nodes while underestimated on others.
>
> This doesn't impose any real problem to correctnes of the kernel
> behavior as the counter is not used for any internal processing but it
> can cause some confusion to the userspace.
>
> Address the problem by accounting each vmalloc backing page to its own
> node.
>
> Fixes: 991e7673859e ("mm: memcontrol: account kernel stack per node")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuc...@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shake...@google.com>
With changes proposed by Shakeel and Michal, this looks good to me.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
I guess the BUG_ON() was inspired by memcg_charge_kernel_stack() - not
really your fault for following that example. But yeah, please drop it
from your patch. Thanks!
