On Wed 03 Mar 14:01 CST 2021, Siddharth Gupta wrote: > From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rana...@codeaurora.org> > > For security reasons scnprintf() is preferred over sprintf(). > Hence, convert the remoteproc's sysfs show functions accordingly. >
Thanks for the patch Siddharth. There's no possibility for these calls to generate more than PAGE_SIZE amount of data, so this isn't really necessary. But if you insist, please let's use sysfs_emit() instead. Regards, Bjorn > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rana...@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sid...@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c > index 1dbef89..853f569 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c > @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ static ssize_t recovery_show(struct device *dev, > { > struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev); > > - return sprintf(buf, "%s", rproc->recovery_disabled ? "disabled\n" : > "enabled\n"); > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s", > + rproc->recovery_disabled ? "disabled\n" : "enabled\n"); > } > > /* > @@ -82,7 +83,7 @@ static ssize_t coredump_show(struct device *dev, > { > struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev); > > - return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", rproc_coredump_str[rproc->dump_conf]); > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", > rproc_coredump_str[rproc->dump_conf]); > } > > /* > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >