On Thu, Jan 10 2008, David Dillow wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:44 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote: > > David Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > At the moment, I'm not sure how to track this farther, or how to fix it > > > properly. Any advice would be appreciated. > > > > Just out of curiosity, could you try the appended cumulative patch and > > report .clock_warps, .clock_overflows and .clock_underflows as you did. > > With those patches, CONFIG_NO_HZ works just fine. > > Patched kernel, nohz=off: > now at 214257.820809 msecs > .clock : 214212.727559 > .idle_clock : 0.000000 > .prev_clock_raw : 244569.402345 > .clock_warps : 0 > .clock_overflows : 577 > .clock_underflows : 213887 > .clock_deep_idle_events : 4 > .clock_max_delta : 0.999830 > > Patched kernel, nohz=on: > now at 248931.524381 msecs > .clock : 248745.808465 > .idle_clock : 0.000000 > .prev_clock_raw : 270911.098507 > .clock_warps : 0 > .clock_overflows : 69 > .clock_underflows : 784 > .clock_deep_idle_events : 4 > .clock_max_delta : 100.639397 > > Running my disk test, blktrace is getting the proper timestamps now with > CONFIG_NO_HZ.
Thanks for reporting this. Guillaume, did you write this patch? We need to get it into 2.6.24-rc7 asap. Let me know if I should take care of that, or if it's already queued up elsewhere. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
