On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:42 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:24:34 +0900 > KOSAKI Motohiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > below patch is a bit cleanup proposal. > > i think LRU_FILE is more clarify than "/2". > > > > What do you think it? > > Thank you for the cleanup, your version looks a lot nicer. > I have applied your patch to my series. >
Rik: I think we also want to do something like: - BUILD_BUG_ON(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE != 2 || LRU_ACTIVE_FILE != 3); + BUILD_BUG_ON(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE != 2 || LRU_ACTIVE_FILE != 3 || + NR_LRU_LISTS > 6); Then we'll be warned if future change might break our implicit assumption that any lru_list value with '0x2' set is a file lru. Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
