From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

From: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>

commit 95c85fba1f64c3249c67f0078a29f8a125078189 upstream.

It's wrong calling btrfs_put_block_group in
__btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space if the block group passed is
different than the block group the cluster represents. As this means the
cluster doesn't have a reference to the passed block group. This results
in double put and a use-after-free bug.

Fix this by simply bailing if the block group we passed in does not
match the block group on the cluster.

Fixes: fa9c0d795f7b ("Btrfs: rework allocation clustering")
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -2708,8 +2708,10 @@ static void __btrfs_return_cluster_to_fr
        struct rb_node *node;
 
        spin_lock(&cluster->lock);
-       if (cluster->block_group != block_group)
-               goto out;
+       if (cluster->block_group != block_group) {
+               spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
+               return;
+       }
 
        cluster->block_group = NULL;
        cluster->window_start = 0;
@@ -2747,8 +2749,6 @@ static void __btrfs_return_cluster_to_fr
                                   entry->offset, &entry->offset_index, bitmap);
        }
        cluster->root = RB_ROOT;
-
-out:
        spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
        btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
 }


Reply via email to