On 04.03.21 07:58, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2/12/21 1:02 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>>
>> Add support for two Siemens SIMATIC IOT2050 variants, Basic and
>> Advanced. They are based on the TI AM6528 GP and AM6548 SOCs HS, thus
>> differ in their number of cores and availability of security features.
>> Furthermore the Advanced version comes with more RAM, an eMMC and a few
>> internal differences.
>>
>> Based on original version by Le Jin.
>>
>> Link: 
>> https://new.siemens.com/global/en/products/automation/pc-based/iot-gateways/simatic-iot2050.html
>> Link: https://github.com/siemens/meta-iot2050
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigne...@ti.com>
> 

Thanks!

> Few minor comments below:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +
>> +&mcu_i2c0 {
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_i2c0_pins_default>;
>> +    clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> +    psu: tps62363@60 {
> 
> Please use generic node names:
> 
>       psu: regulator@60 { ... };
> 

Done.

>> +            compatible = "ti,tps62363";
>> +            reg =  <0x60>;
>> +            regulator-name = "tps62363-vout";
>> +            regulator-min-microvolt = <500000>;
>> +            regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
>> +            regulator-boot-on;
>> +            ti,vsel0-state-high;
>> +            ti,vsel1-state-high;
>> +            ti,enable-vout-discharge;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    /* D4200 */
>> +    pcal9535_1: gpio@20 {
>> +            compatible = "nxp,pcal9535";
>> +            reg = <0x20>;
>> +            #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +            gpio-controller;
>> +            gpio-line-names =
>> +                    "A0-pull", "A1-pull", "A2-pull", "A3-pull", "A4-pull",
>> +                    "A5-pull", "", "",
>> +                    "IO14-enable", "IO15-enable", "IO16-enable",
>> +                    "IO17-enable", "IO18-enable", "IO19-enable";
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    /* D4201 */
>> +    pcal9535_2: gpio@21 {
>> +            compatible = "nxp,pcal9535";
>> +            reg = <0x21>;
>> +            #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +            gpio-controller;
>> +            gpio-line-names =
>> +                    "IO0-direction", "IO1-direction", "IO2-direction",
>> +                    "IO3-direction", "IO4-direction", "IO5-direction",
>> +                    "IO6-direction", "IO7-direction",
>> +                    "IO8-direction", "IO9-direction", "IO10-direction",
>> +                    "IO11-direction", "IO12-direction", "IO13-direction",
>> +                    "IO19-direction";
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    /* D4202 */
>> +    pcal9535_3: gpio@25 {
>> +            compatible = "nxp,pcal9535";
>> +            reg = <0x25>;
>> +            #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +            gpio-controller;
>> +            gpio-line-names =
>> +                    "IO0-pull", "IO1-pull", "IO2-pull", "IO3-pull",
>> +                    "IO4-pull", "IO5-pull", "IO6-pull", "IO7-pull",
>> +                    "IO8-pull", "IO9-pull", "IO10-pull", "IO11-pull",
>> +                    "IO12-pull", "IO13-pull";
>> +    };
>> +};
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +&dwc3_0 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&usb0_phy {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
> 
> These nodes are enabled by default right? Above is redundant.

Seems like historic left-overs here - fixed.

> 
>> +&usb0 {
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&usb0_pins_default>;
>> +    dr_mode = "host";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&dwc3_1 {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&usb1_phy {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
> 
> Same here...

Also fixed.

> 
>> +&usb1 {
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&usb1_pins_default>;
>> +    dr_mode = "host";
>> +};
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +&mcu_spi0 {
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_spi0_pins_default>;
>> +
>> +    #address-cells = <1>;
>> +    #size-cells= <0>;
>> +    ti,pindir-d0-out-d1-in = <1>;
>> +
>> +    spidev@0 {
>> +            compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv";
>> +            spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
>> +            reg = <0>;
>> +    };
> 
> Is the device really dh2228fv?

At least to my understanding, "rohm,dh2228fv" is commonly used for
declaring spidev, and this is what we need for userland here.

> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +&tscadc0 {
>> +    status = "disabled";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&tscadc1 {
>> +    adc {
>> +            ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5>;
>> +    };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&ospi0 {
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default>;
>> +
>> +    flash@0 {
>> +            compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> +            reg = <0x0>;
>> +            spi-tx-bus-width = <1>;
>> +            spi-rx-bus-width = <1>;
>> +            spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> +            cdns,tshsl-ns = <60>;
>> +            cdns,tsd2d-ns = <60>;
>> +            cdns,tchsh-ns = <60>;
>> +            cdns,tslch-ns = <60>;
>> +            cdns,read-delay = <2>;
>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>> +            #size-cells = <1>;
>> +    };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&dss {
>> +    status = "okay";
>> +
> 
> Node is enabled by default. Please drop above line for consistency.

Done.

> 
>> +    pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +    pinctrl-0 = <&dss_vout1_pins_default>;
>> +
>> +    assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 67 2>;
>> +    assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 67 5>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&dss_ports {
>> +    #address-cells = <1>;
>> +    #size-cells = <0>;
>> +    port@1 {
>> +            reg = <1>;
>> +
>> +            dpi_out: endpoint {
>> +                    remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>;
>> +            };
>> +    };
>> +};
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
> Regards
> Vignesh
> 

Thanks again, v3 will come after some testing.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Reply via email to