On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:30:23AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:55:27AM -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > When get_task_mm() returns NULL to mm, no error return code of
> > proc_map_files_readdir() is assigned.
> > To fix this bug, ret is assigned with -ENOENT in this case.
> > --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> > @@ -2332,8 +2332,10 @@ proc_map_files_readdir(struct file *file, struct
> > dir_context *ctx)
> > goto out_put_task;
> >
> > mm = get_task_mm(task);
> > - if (!mm)
> > + if (!mm) {
> > + ret = -ENOENT;
> > goto out_put_task;
> > + }
> >
> > ret = mmap_read_lock_killable(mm);
>
> Is there something in particular that makes you think that returning ENOENT is
> the correct behavior in this case? Try 'ls /proc/$pid/map_files' where pid
> is a
> kernel thread; it's an empty directory, which is probably intentional. Your
> patch would change reading the directory to fail with ENOENT.
Yes. 0 from readdir means "no more stuff", not an error.
