On 2021/3/10 10:54, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
Hi Jia-Ju,
From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 10:39 PM
On 2021/3/9 19:59, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
Hi Jia-Ju,
Thank you for the patch!
From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:01 PM
When __usbhsf_pkt_get() returns NULL to pkt, no error return code of
usbhsf_pkt_handler() is assigned.
Yes. Also I realized that no error return code of usbhsf_pkt_handler()
was assigned if the type value was unexpected value. So, I'm thinking
initial value of ret should be -EINVAL instead of 0.
This is okay to me.
Need I write a new patch for this?
Thank you for your reply. I can write such a new patch with your
Reported-by for this as minor refactoring of the usbhsf_pkt_handler().
May I write such a patch?
Okay, sure :)
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
