> On Mar 10, 2021, at 12:43 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:50:30PM -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> Fix a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.
>> 
>> $ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
>> 
>> EXTRACT_CERTS   ../
>> At main.c:154:
>> - SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: 
>> crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
>> extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
>> make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 
>> (ignored)
>> 
>> When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
>> into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2].  Change from
>> using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING  to the new
>> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/[email protected]/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
>> [2] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/[email protected]/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
>> 
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <[email protected]>
> 
> Got my first ever chance to try out b4:
> 
> $ b4 am [email protected]
> Looking up 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg%40oracle.com
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/keyrings
> Analyzing 5 messages in the thread
> ---
> Writing 
> ./v2_20210304_eric_snowberg_certs_fix_wrong_kconfig_option_used_for_x509_revocation_list.mbx
>  ✓ [PATCH v2] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
>    + Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
>  ---
>  ✓ Attestation-by: DKIM/oracle.com (From: [email protected])
> ---
> Total patches: 1
> ---
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Base: not found
>       git am 
> ./v2_20210304_eric_snowberg_certs_fix_wrong_kconfig_option_used_for_x509_revocation_list.mbx
> 
> Wondering tho, what "Base: not found" means?

This was based off David’s keys-next branch, which I think has now
changed.  I probably should have sent this with the following base-commit:

base-commit: ea20ea8b8ba4d475ebc79da63350850780933a81

I’ll try to remember to make sure to have the base-commit added in
the future.

Reply via email to