On 15:14-20210311, Jan Kiszka wrote: [...]
> > > > See [1] compare the compatibles against > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings -> I think you should describe what > > your hardware really is though. > > This SPI bus is routed to an Arduino connector. By default, userspace > (e.g. mraa) takes ownership and adds the desired logic for what is being > connected. We have no idea what shield or other extension the user adds, > though. overlays look like the right approach for variable systems like these. It is not exactly plug and play.. but it does provide a level of flexibility that is helpful. [..] > The problem here is not simple txt->yml conversion: There is no official > binding for spidev yet, just existing users and the driver waiting for them. > I think we should discuss in the spidev list to get it resolved. > > Thanks.. While it might help me personally to get some on my internal > > farm, it might be good to get them on kernelci as well on the longer > > run. > > > > Will keep that on the radar. I definitely want to get it into the CIP > LAVA lab which is testing LTS as well. Cool. > Are we talking about spidev here? Then let's drop that node, but I do > need to know how to describe spidev properly yes - the spidev is my problem. can you drop the node and repost? i cant locally modify and hope it works. > > Or is it about those other warnings coming from your dtsi files, now > being surfaced? If you can tell me how to resolve them, I can write patches. I will look at the warnings later today.. I dont think they are triggered by the board dts. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
