On Sat 13-03-21 12:23:00, Jiang Biao wrote:
> From: Bin Lai <robin...@tencent.com>
>
> From: Bin Lai <robin...@tencent.com>
>
> The oc->chosen is used by oom implementation, and the caller does
> not initialize this variable. If the tasks of memcg are all unkillable,
> oom_evaluate_task cann't choose any task, and the oc->chosen will be
> a wild pointer. So we should initialize oc->chosen before calling
> oom_evaluate_task.
All callers do initialize oom_control on the stack and even partial
structure initialization on stack will result in the zeroying of all
other structure's element. So I do not think there is any problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Lai <robin...@tencent.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbji...@tencent.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 9efaf43..0658a30 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task,
> void *arg)
> static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
> {
> oc->chosen_points = LONG_MIN;
> + oc->chosen = NULL;
>
> if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
> mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->memcg, oom_evaluate_task, oc);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
