Hello!

On 15.03.2021 5:39, Wang Qing wrote:

platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
the printing here is nothing special, and should corrected to < 0.

Also, thhe return value should return a real error.

   The.
It's a bad idea to mix the fix and cleanup in one patch (and to do two things in one patch as well); also describing a bug fix as an "appendage"
to the clean up. Anyway, I had already posted the fix here:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=161575450917827

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangq...@vivo.com>
---
  drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c | 6 ++----
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
index 64b2ef1..4438ee6
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
@@ -469,10 +469,8 @@ static int ahci_highbank_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
        }
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-       if (irq <= 0) {
-               dev_err(dev, "no irq\n");
-               return -EINVAL;
-       }
+       if (irq < 0)
+               return irq;

   What about irq == 0?
  [...]

MBR, Sergei

Reply via email to