On Monday 15 Mar 2021 at 16:33:23 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:35:14PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > > We will need to do cache maintenance at EL2 soon, so compile a copy of > > __flush_dcache_area at EL2, and provide a copy of arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 > > as it is needed by the read_ctr macro. > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qper...@google.com> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h | 2 ++ > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/Makefile | 3 ++- > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S | 13 +++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h > > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h > > index 3fd9f60d2180..efba1b89b8a4 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_cpufeature.h > > @@ -13,3 +13,5 @@ > > #define KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(name) extern struct arm64_ftr_reg > > kvm_nvhe_sym(name) > > #endif > > #endif > > + > > +KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG(arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0); > > I still think this is a bit weird. If you really want to macro-ise stuff, > then why not follow the sort of thing we do for e.g. per-cpu variables and > have separate DECLARE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG and DEFINE_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG macros. > > That way kvm_cpufeature.h can have header guards like a normal header and > we can drop the '#ifndef KVM_HYP_CPU_FTR_REG' altogether. I don't think > the duplication of the symbol name really matters -- it should fail at > build time if something is missing.
I just tend to hate unnecessary boilerplate, but if you feel strongly about it, happy to change :) Cheers, Quentin