Hi Tianling, CC Jacek, Pavel
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tianling Shen <cns...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2021-03-16 02:23 Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Personally, I'm not so fond of the <foo>-%u node names, and prefer > > <foo>-<function>. With the former, it's way too easy to have a silent > > override in your .dts(i) stack. > > Cfr. commit 45f5d5a9e34d3fe4 ("arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: draak: > > Fix backlight regulator name") > > How about using `lan-led`, `sys-led` and `wan-led` here? Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml says "led-%u" is the preferred form, but that anything containing "led" as a substring is accepted. So I'd go for "led-lan" etc. BTW, you can validate your DTB against the leds-gpio DT bindings by running: make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml Background info for CCed parties: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210316150033.15987-1-cns...@gmail.com/ Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds